Attention Deficit Hawks! According to the CBO, the DREAM Act will reduce the Deficit (not by an earth-shattering number), but it save money!
But none of y'all care about that, because Conservatives are fiscal frauds of the first order:
The DREAM Act, which has traditionally enjoyed strong bipartisan support, provides a path to citizenship for these young immigrants -- graduate from high school, get conditional permanent residency status, go to college or serve in the military, and become eligible for citizenship.
Yesterday, the Congressional Budget Office made the pitch even easier.
On Thursday, CBO estimated the bill would reduce the deficit by $1.4 billion over the next decade. The figure reflects a $1.4 billion increase in on-budget deficits, and a $2.8 billion decrease in off-budget deficits, CBO noted. Only on-budget figures are considered under pay-as-you-go budget rules adopted by the House.
This probably won't change a lot of minds; nearly all Republicans, including those who helped write the DREAM Act, have decided the bill constitutes "amnesty."
That said, the CBO score does bring to mind a fairly consistent trend in recent policy debates. For all of the obsessive attention, especially from the right, focused on reducing the deficit, Republicans have a nasty habit of rejecting ideas that actually help close the budget shortfall.
The Democratic health care reform proposal lowered the deficit ... and Republicans opposed it.
The Democratic student-loan bill lowered the deficit ... and Republicans opposed it.
The Democratic effort to let Bush tax cuts for the rich expire would lower the deficit ... and Republicans oppose it.
The Democratic energy/climate bill would lower the deficit ... and Republicans oppose it.
The Democratic effort to reduce bloated Pentagon spending would lower the deficit ... and most Republicans oppose it.
It's almost as if Republicans say they care about deficit reduction, until they're offered a chance to actually reduce the deficit.
If I didn't know better, I might think GOP officials don't think a deficit-reduction measure "counts" unless it undermines struggling families in some way. That couldn't be, could it?
No comments:
Post a Comment