- You find it hard to be enthusiastic for something until you know that others oppose it.
- You have little interest in getting clear on what exactly is the position being argued.
- Realizing that a topic is important and neglected doesn’t make you much interested.
- You have little interest in digging to bigger topics behind commonly argued topics.
- You are less interested in a topic when you don’t foresee being able to talk about it.
- You are uncomfortable taking a position near the middle of the opinion distribution.
- You are uncomfortable taking a position of high uncertainty about who is right.
- You care far more about current nearby events than similar distant or past/future events.
- You find it easy to conclude that those who disagree with you are insincere or stupid.
- You are reluctant to change your publicly stated positions in response to new info.
- You are reluctant to agree a rival’s claim, even if you had no prior opinion on the topic.
- You are reluctant to take a position that raises the status of rivals.
Wednesday, September 29, 2010
Breitbart Syndrome
Andrew Sullivan (still mad at ya!) was re-posting a list of "signs that your opinions function more to signal loyalty and ability than to estimate truth". He named a few as Breitbart Syndrome, after functioning racist, Andrew Breitbart:
Labels:
Analysis,
Conservatives,
Ethics,
Humor,
Ideology
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment